Talk:Infectious Disease Ontology - Revision history

Mathias at 16:07, 23 September 2007

2007-09-23T16:07:39Z

Lgcowell at 20:13, 21 September 2007

2007-09-21T20:13:59Z

Mathias at 17:48, 19 September 2007

2007-09-19T17:48:05Z

Mathias at 17:42, 19 September 2007

2007-09-19T17:42:12Z

Mathias at 17:41, 19 September 2007

2007-09-19T17:41:52Z

Mathias at 01:55, 18 September 2007

2007-09-18T01:55:22Z

Mathias at 01:52, 18 September 2007

2007-09-18T01:52:35Z

Mathias: New page: I just had a look at the ontology and I was a bit surprised that there is no sub-BFO Hierarchy. Fly, Insect and Organism are siblings which strikes me as odd. Is there a reason for this?

2007-09-18T01:52:08Z

New page: I just had a look at the ontology and I was a bit surprised that there is no sub-BFO Hierarchy. Fly, Insect and Organism are siblings which strikes me as odd. Is there a reason for this?

New page

I just had a look at the ontology and I was a bit surprised that there is no sub-BFO Hierarchy. Fly, Insect and Organism are siblings which strikes me as odd. Is there a reason for this?

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 I just had a look at the ontology and I was a bit surprised that there is no sub-BFO Hierarchy. Fly, Insect and Organism are siblings which strikes me as odd. Is there a reason for this? (Mathias Brochhausen, IFOMIS)
-'''Hi Mathias - agreed, fly, insect and organism should not be siblings.  These terms should probably not even be in IDO as they are (i think) in other ontologies.  What do others think?'''
+Hi Mathias - agreed, fly, insect and organism should not be siblings.  These terms should probably not even be in IDO as they are (i think) in other ontologies.  What do others think?
 By the way is there a chance of getting a owl file (with definitions) in order to work directly on it? Mathias
@@ Line 9: / Line 11: @@
 How do you define "pain". Depending on the definition I would not agree that pain is an object. Mathias
-'''Good question.  We had lots of interesting discussion about pain.  Is pain the perception or the signals that the brain receives and perceives as pain?  What do you think?
+Good question.  We had lots of interesting discussion about pain.  Is pain the perception or the signals that the brain receives and perceives as pain?  What do you think?
 '''
 I am not sure whether being epidemic and being pandemic qualifies as a criterion differntiating two universals. I'd think this is either two FiatProcessParts (since the thresholds are defied by humans, if I remember that right, or maybe a property or a quality.....What do you think? Mathias

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 I just had a look at the ontology and I was a bit surprised that there is no sub-BFO Hierarchy. Fly, Insect and Organism are siblings which strikes me as odd. Is there a reason for this? (Mathias Brochhausen, IFOMIS)
 By the way is there a chance of getting a owl file (with definitions) in order to work directly on it? Mathias
 How do you define "pain". Depending on the definition I would not agree that pain is an object. Mathias
 I am not sure whether being epidemic and being pandemic qualifies as a criterion differntiating two universals. I'd think this is either two FiatProcessParts (since the thresholds are defied by humans, if I remember that right, or maybe a property or a quality.....What do you think? Mathias

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:48, 19 September 2007
Line 4:		Line 4:

	How do you define "pain". Depending on the definition I would not agree that pain is an object. Mathias		How do you define "pain". Depending on the definition I would not agree that pain is an object. Mathias
		+
		+	I am not sure whether being epidemic and being pandemic qualifies as a criterion differntiating two universals. I'd think this is either two FiatProcessParts (since the thresholds are defied by humans, if I remember that right, or maybe a property or a quality.....What do you think? Mathias

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 I just had a look at the ontology and I was a bit surprised that there is no sub-BFO Hierarchy. Fly, Insect and Organism are siblings which strikes me as odd. Is there a reason for this? (Mathias Brochhausen, IFOMIS)
 By the way is there a chance of getting a owl file (with definitions) in order to work directly on it? Mathias
 How do you define "pain". Depending on the definition I would not agree that pain is an object. Mathias

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:41, 19 September 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I just had a look at the ontology and I was a bit surprised that there is no sub-BFO Hierarchy. Fly, Insect and Organism are siblings which strikes me as odd. Is there a reason for this? (Mathias Brochhausen, IFOMIS)		I just had a look at the ontology and I was a bit surprised that there is no sub-BFO Hierarchy. Fly, Insect and Organism are siblings which strikes me as odd. Is there a reason for this? (Mathias Brochhausen, IFOMIS)
	By the way is there a chance of getting a owl file (with definitions) in order to work directly on it? Mathias		By the way is there a chance of getting a owl file (with definitions) in order to work directly on it? Mathias
		+	How do you define "pain". Depending on the definition I would not agree that pain is an object. Mathias

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:55, 18 September 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I just had a look at the ontology and I was a bit surprised that there is no sub-BFO Hierarchy. Fly, Insect and Organism are siblings which strikes me as odd. Is there a reason for this? (Mathias Brochhausen, IFOMIS)		I just had a look at the ontology and I was a bit surprised that there is no sub-BFO Hierarchy. Fly, Insect and Organism are siblings which strikes me as odd. Is there a reason for this? (Mathias Brochhausen, IFOMIS)
		+	By the way is there a chance of getting a owl file (with definitions) in order to work directly on it? Mathias

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:52, 18 September 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	I just had a look at the ontology and I was a bit surprised that there is no sub-BFO Hierarchy. Fly, Insect and Organism are siblings which strikes me as odd. Is there a reason for this?	+	I just had a look at the ontology and I was a bit surprised that there is no sub-BFO Hierarchy. Fly, Insect and Organism are siblings which strikes me as odd. Is there a reason for this? (Mathias Brochhausen, IFOMIS)