Difference between revisions of "Alzforum / Protein Ontology Kick-Off Meeting"

From NCBO Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 28: Line 28:
 
2. Protein complex case study: In addition to the issues addressed above as these arise for protein complexes, this case study will address in addition: criteria for being a complex - what amount of stability is necessary, component stoichiometry and structure, modifications/changes to complexes and associated functional changes. <-- SPECIFIC RELEVANCE TO AD NOT CLEAR
 
2. Protein complex case study: In addition to the issues addressed above as these arise for protein complexes, this case study will address in addition: criteria for being a complex - what amount of stability is necessary, component stoichiometry and structure, modifications/changes to complexes and associated functional changes. <-- SPECIFIC RELEVANCE TO AD NOT CLEAR
  
==Tentative Schedule==
+
==Very Tentative Schedule==
  
Tuesday, October 4
+
'''Tuesday, October 4'''
  
 
9:30am  
 
9:30am  
Line 40: Line 40:
 
10:30am Break
 
10:30am Break
  
11:00am  
+
11:00am Variants
  
Variants: How to relate variants, and collect requirements for the level of specificity needed in descriptions of variants to meet the needs of AD researchers. (This is one of several pending issues unresolved in the Neurocommons [http://neurocommons.org/page/Semantic_resources_project Semantic Resources]
+
12:30pm Lunch
  
Different kinds of aggregates of protein relevant to AD, how do people treat them
+
1:30pm Case Study 1
  
Start with APP, what are all the genetic variants? How does PRO deal with that? How do variants relate.
+
6:00pm Dinner
  
Case Study: Perform a detailed review of one class of proteins important to AD research, chosen to be part of the research agenda of at least one of the AD scientists, to bring all participants up to the same level of understanding about what's known. Issues to be addressed will include:
+
9:00am Case Study 2
:: importance of recording non-protein constituents
 
:: multimerism
 
:: relations to disease hypotheses
 
:: kinds of evidence
 
:: research plan
 
:: protein knowledge queries that would aid the AD researchers
 
:: protein knowledge queries the AD researchers think their colleagues ought to be able to do that would retrieve their own results
 
 
Complexes:
 
Same issues as above, but for protein complexes. To address in
 
addition: criteria for being a complex - what amount of stability
 
necessary, component stoichiometry and structure,
 
modifications/changes to complexes and associated functional changes.
 
  
- Based on above analysis set project goals for 3 months, 6 months, 1 year.
+
12:30 Lunch
  
 +
1:30pm
  
 +
2:30pm Project planning
  
 +
3:30pm Main meeting ends
  
'''Intending Participants'''
+
Technical session for selected participants during rest of day.
 +
 
 +
==Intending Participants==
 
*Cecilia Arighi (Delaware)
 
*Cecilia Arighi (Delaware)
 
*Peter d'Eustachio (New York)
 
*Peter d'Eustachio (New York)

Revision as of 17:31, 20 July 2011

Venue

October 4-5, Buffalo, NY

Goals of the meeting

The goal of this meeting is to initiate a project that is designed to lead to the creation of a protein information resource that will address the needs of Alzheimers Disease (AD) researchers in a maximally effective way.

The project forms part of the NIGMS-funded Protein Ontology initiative. Topics to be addressed at the meeting will include

Protein Variants How can we most effectively represent information pertaining to the variants associated with AD and to the relations between them; for example, what level of specificity of descriptions of variants would best address the requirements of AD researchers? In the case of APP, for example, what are the genetic variants of relevance to APP? How should the Protein Ontology deal with such variants in order to assist researchers.

Aggregates of proteins What are the different kinds of aggregates of protein relevant to AD, how do AD researchers treat them?

We envisage two case studies in the course of the meeting, both of which will be designed to serve as guidance for Protein Ontology developers in the initial phases of the project:

1. Protein case study: Perform a detailed review of one class of proteins important to AD research, chosen to be part of the research agenda of at least one of the AD scientists, to bring all participants up to the same level of understanding about what os known. Issues to be addressed will include:

importance of recording non-protein constituents
multimerism
relations to disease hypotheses
kinds of evidence
research plan
protein knowledge queries that would aid the AD researchers
protein knowledge queries the AD researchers think their colleagues ought to be able to do that would retrieve their own results

2. Protein complex case study: In addition to the issues addressed above as these arise for protein complexes, this case study will address in addition: criteria for being a complex - what amount of stability is necessary, component stoichiometry and structure, modifications/changes to complexes and associated functional changes. <-- SPECIFIC RELEVANCE TO AD NOT CLEAR

Very Tentative Schedule

Tuesday, October 4

9:30am

  • Introduction to the project; introduction of project personnel
  • Introduction to the AD research problems to be addressed
  • Introduction to ontology-based ontology for scientists

10:30am Break

11:00am Variants

12:30pm Lunch

1:30pm Case Study 1

6:00pm Dinner

9:00am Case Study 2

12:30 Lunch

1:30pm

2:30pm Project planning

3:30pm Main meeting ends

Technical session for selected participants during rest of day.

Intending Participants

  • Cecilia Arighi (Delaware)
  • Peter d'Eustachio (New York)
  • Alex Diehl (Buffalo)
  • Darren Natale (Washington)
  • Alan Ruttenberg (Buffalo)
  • Kinga Szigati (Buffalo)
  • Barry Smith (Buffalo)
  • Cathy Wu (Delaware)
  • Elizabeth Wu (Boston)